Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

Should not intelligent, reasonable men of good will be able to agree on all things that matter?

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Article Synopses and other features

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Bible/Canon Issues
Christendom Analyzed

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon

Philosophy Material
Academic Education
Paradigm Material
Philosophers of Note
Philosophical Issues
Philosophy Metaphysics
Psychological Issues
Religious Miscellaneous
Sociological Material
Theological Basics
Theological Issues
Theological Misc

Theological Skeptical

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material

Cosmology Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Chronology Revision
Golden Age Themes
History Revision
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Modern Mythology Material
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Saturnian Reconstruction
Symbol Development
Venus-Mars Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium

Miscellaneous Material
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Site Features Links
Site article checklist
Spiritual Products online store


If it is true that there is Someone in charge of the whole question of life and death, we can hardly expect to escape a sense of futility and frustration until we begin to see what He is like and what His purposes are. - J. B. Phillips, translator of The New Testament in modern English, Your God is too Small, MacMillan Publishing Co., New York, NY 10022  p. 9.

Some Personal Conclusions?

It is my style or at least preference, to have people draw their own conclusions before suffering my own, because if they come to essentially the same, then I have a much greater assurance that my own reasoning process is sound. Yet, I am comfortable putting down a few of my concluding thoughts as a kind of summary.

In my wide-ranging canvass of religious thought, I have never come across anything very close to the vision that I have painted or implied in this website. Given that the starting point for this thinking is internal–what I/we know directly, what I/we intrinsically want and need–it represents a total rethink of all the issues from a decidedly different starting point. If this is a legitimate starting point and a legitimate approach, it should come as no great shock to think that possibly all before us have missed the true vision so far.

Have we not programmed ourselves to fail to understand the mind or will of God by making it--a priori--mystical, transcendent, or alien, beyond our ken? Have we not further conditioned ourselves to focus on our weakness, our inferior status, our misery, our disempowerment? Have we not been overly influenced by the consistent message of relentless indifference from physical reality, suggesting or implying our lack of value? Do we not have overwhelming evidence that even the best of humanity can be fundamentally wrong, even in most of the scientific or academic disciplines? Can we not see that the message from God that will make THE difference has been buried under ancient "scripture" that is NOT the word of God but merely traditional cultural mythology?

At least one salient point is worthy of note: The composition of this vision is educated by significant learning in most of the intellectual disciplines or fields, including cosmology, chemistry, physics, geology, biology, paleontology, archaeology, mythology, philosophy, psychology, anthropology, linguistic origins and etymology, ancient history and chronology, etc., and a life long interest and some formal seminary courses in Christian theology, and a variety of advanced degrees from the school of hard knocks. It is  restricted and contained by being faithful to proper philosophical principles and sound science, by being intellectually responsible. And last but not least it has also been influenced and enlarged by my being a son, a father, a brother, a close friend and companion, a colleague in a close group of advanced scientists and scholars, and having been a business partner, husband and lover.

Can Man Be Satisfied?

It is often said that Man can never be satisfied! If this is so, are we not then either fundamentally flawed in nature beyond any possible personal fault of our own, and/or is the very fabric of reality not suitable for us? Without believing either of these positions, cannot we see that the IF-I-SEEK-US package is a legitimate, desired state of being for the whole of humanity? Is it not a condition and situation any humane, rational, sane, and mature person can want and live with and be elated by for all eternity? Does it not elevate human value and worth, freedom and liberty, autonomy and sovereignty, and destiny to the highest level possible to conceive?

God Not into Enablement

Is it not conceivable, even arguable, that if the Universe was originally created for our benefit, then IF-I-SEEK-US IS achievable because it is the intended norm, and it would be a return to original normalcy? Would it not also follow that unfallen humanity–those that chose to believe in equality–live in and have never left this state of being, and they are the ones in control? However compassionate and humane they might be, would they be in the business of enabling spiritually troubled ad dangerous people to continue to use such power and intelligence for such perverse purposes as have been done and demonstrated already by our human family? Consequently would they  impose it upon or share it with us without our being spiritual healed? Would they also violate or override our personal, familial, or global corporate sovereignty? Unless our volition and will so direct it, would not they be very limited in what they can ethically do?

It is likely that after the fall of man, presumably an event long before but leading to the end of the golden age in antiquity on earth, humanity became hopelessly lost in a spiritual fog of incorrect and destructive concepts. Is it not likely this was the factor condemning all of humanity to our hapless state of tortuous limitation, disempowerment, and victimhood? A pall was cast upon the whole creation, and the rest of those in the universe--being aware of what is happening on earth--could not help but be solemnized and saddened by our tragedies and suffering.

In a world of depravity and confusion, where the disabling and paralyzing noise to signal ratio was increasing and the spiritual fragmentation of the race was accelerating, help was needed. Can we not see that the J-person, as the Originator and ordained representative of unfallen humanity, came to reveal the correct conceptual vision of God and ourselves, and rectify our distorted views? But humanity has misunderstood and/or ignored his message. We have amalgamated his pliable words to the prevailing religious ideology of the time. This was itself derived from institutionalized mythology as a result of fallen man anthropomorphizing the ancient planets and their destructive activities in the Solar system.

The implication is that we are NOT condemned to just age and die, all the while hoping that within our lifetime the J-person will come back to save us. In contrast, imminent salvation is proclaimed to be available to those who understand the J-person's words and come into unity of purpose, values, and paradigm of reality, an understanding of valid concepts of a God worthy of the term. . According to the promise, once two or three individuals are able to achieve this, whatever they ask will be received or accomplished. It would be presumed then that once individuals regain contact with unfallen humanity and become literal peers once more, such an event would rapidly precipitate a change beyond our incorrect assumptions of what is currently realistic. Does it make sense that the Universe is waiting for us to regain our senses and bid farewell to our current horrific state of existence, and that it is time to eliminate suffering and death at long last?

Three Major Premises

1. The Romantic Beginning of All Things: The creation of the universe was beun by the consciousness of a single human entity who created a fellow being to share an extensive range of pleasurable and fulfilling experience in a reality that supported this visionary plan. If we do not arbitrarily and unduly limit the Originator, we can take our thinking out of the male gender box. Since it is widely recognized that males are more simple creatures than females, maybe it is appropriate to think of the Originator as taking on the female gender role, as, "In the beginning, She decided to do something risky. She created a man, mated with him, and had children gods." Is it easier to think that the male mind or psyche envisioned, designed and created the great dance of romance? Or the female? Is it more of a forgone conclusion that a created female would mate with a male originator, or conversely that a perfect male would be enchanted by and mate with a beautiful and perfect female?


2. Shared Creativity

Since all beings at this point in time were equal in everything that matters, including creativity, another really beautiful idea is that at some point some creative person exclaimed that they had an idea to really jazz up this fellowship, sharing, intimacy and enhancement of life experience and morale. That person advanced the idea of producing two different genders. Seeing the potential merits, they all would have been keen on this and would have all contributed to designing the various features of this new sexual dimension, procreation and the romantic relationship. Once this was accomplished they all chose one of the two gender roles. There is really no good reason to think that the Original One thought up, designed or created everything, because his nature is to serve and find satisfaction and delight in the enterprise of his created equals.[*]

This latter vision highlights the distinction–in a very important arena–between the traditional  concept of the creator as being the fount of every aspect of reality and we being the passive recipients of whatever he presents to us versus the vision that we are MEANT to be, and the unfallen humans ARE, active creative agents that not only participate in the unfolding of the creation of our reality, but are now in control of it in the collective known as "The Father". In other words, the number of creative agents in the universe is, or at least has been growing. As long as there is perfect unity of purpose, values and paradigm, and everyone essentially has veto power, the creation can unfold in wonderful ways that had never entered the mind of the Originator. He can now not only be delighted with his children but can be PROUD, PLEASED AND SURPRISED by their accomplishments! Just like human parents can be when their children live up to their potential.

3. Original Sin as Failure: The fall of our family was not initiated by any act of disobedience or conscious violation of God's will, but by NOT doing something. Since you cannot inject equality into another being without them remaining unequal, equality can only be offered or extended, not imposed! An equal must be involved with their own creation as an equal by CHOOSING to be equal in rights and value amidst an otherwise ocean of inequalities. No two human beings are identical in any specific dimension or aspect, but we can see ourselves and treat each other as equals. The Originator and the existing families extended equality to our family but the original ancestors of our family FAILED to choose to be equal. This failure festered in the hearts of beings designed to not be inferior, and led to the downward spiral of separation and degeneration. All the while, this fallen family was attempting to be superior by creating an alternate system, one of predatory competition that crossed the lines of the eternal values. The French have put these this way: Verité, Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité.

Some other points and perspectives:

  • Even with my current level of nobility, if I were the Originator and or any of the unfallen beings, after what happened to the J person on earth, I would be insulted or turned off by what people have been thinking,, and currently think and teach about "God". Would I not keep my distance until this demeaning perception is corrected?

  • I, myself, as one of the good guys would be so insulted or turned off by such concepts of me and therefore wouldn't have those that feel that way as friends.

  • I have consistently tried to interpret all the information that I have, to paint and imply the very best possible picture of God and reality, of course, using my own human standards, specifications and criteria.

  • Never in the discoverable culture of ancient people before the J-person came was there extant a concept of God that was truly wonderful and inspiring rather than oppressive and fear inducing, and never was there a demonstration of such goodness and grace.

  • As J-person said late in his life as recorded in Luke, "When the son of man passes, will he find belief on the earth? Evidently not!" This very clearly implies that no one at that time caught the vision of God that he wanted us to have.

  • It should be clear that J-person did NOT come to die, but to communicate with and inspire us to a higher vision of God and ourselves as children gods.

  • When this did not happen during his ministry without his violating our volitional sovereignty, only then did he and the "father" set their course for an ultimate demonstration that involved the crucifixion.

  • J-person gave us instructions or directions that are not always explicit but strongly and clearly implied.

  • These instructions have never been understood, nor seen to have any but incidental merit, and consequently the instructions have never been rigorously followed.

  • When J-person said, "I am the way, the truth, and the light," he was saying that he was the paradigm, the truth that goes into it, and the inspiration to accept and follow the instructions.

  • Traditional religions and religious thought have only precluded and clouded our understanding of God's message to, and demonstration for, us.

  • To truly understand, we need to drain the cup and refill it; or as in the parable to clean out the seven demons and listen to his truth and not let them come back.

  • There is no downside or risk to following the instructions of J-person, because these consist of seeking the truth, seeing the revelation of God that he represented, and coming into unity with some others; unity being very desirable in any account.

  • The promised outcome of doing so is the delivery of the entire IF-I-SEEK-US package, the resolution to the human condition, and the beginning of the re-enchantment of reality back to the way they designed it to be.

  • When cosmology and ancient mythology are studied with a truly open and truth-seeking mind, one will see that ancient planetary catastrophe undergirds the development of ancient mythology and ancient planet worship.

  • One will see that in ancient times, how and why the planets were anthropomorphized into gods and demigods and promoted into such prominence.

  • One will see that our current concepts of God are mostly derived from these ancient mythologies and their psychologically disturbed fallaciousness.

  • The life activity and message of J-person was NOT one so much as to correct or upgrade ancient Judaism, but to sweep it away and replace it wholesale, something that Christendom has NOT done.

  • Modern Christianity is heavily and hopelessly contaminated with Zoroastrianism, Judaism, and the constructs of the Greek mystery religions.

  • The modern religions are still primarily structured around variations of ancient Saturn worship replete with most of the trappings.

  • What should be quite disturbing and alarming to doctrinal complacency is that all of the words translated as god or gods in the Old Testament refer primarily to the planet Saturn with a few to the other two planets that were involved with ravaging Earth, namely Mars and Venus.

  • The evidence is unequivocal for the bicameral brain/mind/consciousness in human beings, and an important premise is that in ancient times the race of humanity had a collective consciousness based upon this foundation of the second brain/mind.

  • Before this collective consciousness was disabled or became largely non-functional, humans had a level of primal creative empowerment now known as paranormal abilities.

  • We now have only vestiges of these types of empowerment, and they are little better than parlor tricks, are used for mundane purposes, and form the basis of plausibility for much chicanery and fraud.

  • This ancient collective consciousness was the venue for perfectly complete telepathic communication, among other aspects of now-deemed paranormal ability.

  • We can legitimately speculate/conclude? that the collective consciousness of the unfallen contingent of human beings in the universe forms the ultimate base of power, and is that corporate entity to which J-person referred as being the "Father".

Three major aspects of the Gospel:

1. The foundation of the Gospel is that the nature, character and values of the Originator are totally and only human.

2. The centerpiece of the Gospel is that we are being offered imminent immortality and primal creative empowerment.

3. The capstone of the Gospel is that we are being offered equality through supremacy.

Start over or defend the faith?

The Nietzschean solution was, in effect, to start again now that the values and mythologies of the past had been so thoroughly discredited...His role was simply to see the problem with such tortured clarity that it could never again be ignored.  In his final years he descended into insanity.
   But, for most thinkers, starting again represented a kind of defeat.  It meant throwing away the whole history of religious insight and truth.  Perhaps the more sober, saner response was to find new ways of defending the ancient faith.
Bryan Appleyard, Understanding The Present, Anchor Books, 1540 Broadway, New York, NY. 10036, 1992,  p. 79.

The quote above would apply to me if I had not the understanding that is represented by the material on this site.

My answer

Finally, I would recount part of a discussion over lunch with a close colleague and friend. This colleague and I share a common and essential understanding of the major aspects of a world view, which includes the Electric Universe cosmology, the Saturnian Reconstruction of the ancient times, interplanetary electrical discharge being the major mechanism for most geological formation, spiritual reality being ordinate to physical reality, linguistic and symbol development on the earth, etc., and much, much more. After two decades now of talking with him concerning ultimate issues, arguing and then discussing, we are moving into more agreement but still short of unity on some of these. Knowing that both of us are aware that it borders on arrogance or even megalomania to believe you personally have THE TRUTH concerning God, knowing that I would take it to be a sincere and legitimate query, that I had asked myself this question many times, and that I would give a thoughtful, objective and measured answer, he asked me this question, “Michael, what is the bottom line that gives you such confidence that your particular conclusions concerning God and reality are right?”

After thinking and composing my thoughts for a while, my answer was, “I am going to quote Keats when he said, ‘Beauty is truth, truth beauty.’ I think that my paradigm and my vision is true because I have earnestly been seeking the truth for some forty years now, and because my vision of it has the most sweeping grandeur; the most inspiring beauty; the most compelling elegance; the most reassuring consistency with all the facts, information, knowledge and experience that is available to me; it has the best coherence with my rationality, logic, reason, and romantic nature. It has the elevation of the humane values to the highest level, the greatest extent of plausible and defensible answers to the ultimate issues, and the most resonance with my inner core, with what I am, with what I want and need; that I can elaborate with word and pen. And it is grounded neither upon tradition, consensus nor fancy but upon eyewitness accounts of a historical demonstration.” His reply was, “There is no better answer than that!”

[*]  The concept contained by the paragraph was advanced, not by the creator of the site, but by a fellow believer. When I heard it, even though it didn't agree with my then current thinking, I liked it and adopted it.

Home   Site Sections   Article Map   Contact   Store   Contributions   Survey