Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

Intelligent, reasonable men of good will SHOULD be able to agree on things that matter.

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Reading Sequence, and Article Synopses

Miscellaneous Articles

Advice on Intoxication
Ancient Explosion Reports
Ancient Scholastics
Annals of Addiction
Can We Agree on these?
Constructive Criticism
Critical Issues
Critique of A New Earth
Dead Broke Dads
John the Baptist
How the World Will End
Importance of Catastrophism
Importance of Discussion
Kahlil Gibran on Law
Euhemerism & Catastrophe
EU/Catastrophe & Philosophy
Thoughts on Meditation
Model for Visions & Dreams
Telepathic Ability
Some Pertinent Parables
Personal Experience
Perspective on Myth
Questions Better than Answers
The Road to Saturn Thesis
Sex Bias in Medicine Practice
Spiritual versus Material
Symbolism of Human Body
Tobacco Corruption in AMA
Toxic Metals & Criminality
Unity Agreement Outline
The Velikovsky Debate
Some Conclusions
The Velikovsky Affair Journals
Video-lecture links

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Bible/Canon Issues
Christendom Analyzed

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon

Philosophy Material
Paradigm Material
Philosophical Issues
Psychological Issues
Sociological Material
Theological Basics
Theological Issues
Theological Misc

Theological Skeptical

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material

Cosmology Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Chronology Revision
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Modern Mythology Material
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Symbol Development
Venus-Mars Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium

Miscellaneous Material
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Spiritual Products online store

"...even if someone were to prove to me that the truth lay outside Christ, I should choose to remain with Christ rather than with the truth." - Fyodor Dostoyevsky

Site note: Dostoyevsky is NOT saying here that the truth doesn't matter or can be cast aside. What he IS saying is that there is something in the life and message of Jesus that transcends the logic of rhetorical proof.

The Brothers Karamazov: The Cardinal versus Jesus
Some thoughts on the differences between
the two concerning the 3 temptations

Updated: 04/21/2020

It is the position of this website that the accounts of the "temptations" in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke–they are not in the Gospel of John–are apocryphal and may be based on some undiscovered Hebrew literature or parable, or, more likely, they are based on fabrications surrounding a retreat to be alone in the wilderness by Jesus. The disciples aren't portrayed as being present at the confrontation, and it is hard to imagine that Jesus came back and told them how he passed these specific excruciating tests. This is the stuff of myth

At best, Jesus may have come back from an extended wilderness retreat and confided in the disciples that he was sorely tested while in agonized contemplation, and the accounts got embellished like so many others and grew into these final exaggerations. Nevertheless, regardless of how inaccurate and invalid they may be, they DO provide a foil for portraying some ultimate issues. Here Dostoevsky uses them in his acclaimed novel, and he has the Grand Inquisitor Cardinal explaining to Jesus where he went wrong.

Temptation 1. Ostensibly Jesus was led into the wilderness by "the spirit" (whatever that means in this context), where he fasted for 40 days. Famished, weak and on the edge of dying, he was confronted by Satan[*] with the challenge that if he were the son of God, he would turn some stones to bread and save his own life, thus doing the will of God. Jesus refuses with the quotation that "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by the word of God."

The Cardinal then begins to press his major thesis by claiming that almost all people do not have the courage or strength to use their volition or "free will" and faith at this level, and that this would be an impossible, unloving burden. He then claims that Jesus made a mistake, and should have produced the bread, thus identifying more with the people where they are at and not showing them all up by measuring up to an unreasonable standard and passing such a subtle though simple test. As in, how can you expect people who are dying of hunger to stand up and make such a ridiculous choice?

Temptation 2. The second temptation was to induce or maneuver God into a demonstration of the value he placed in his son. Satan took Jesus to a temple pinnacle in Jerusalem and challenged him that if he were the son of God, by throwing himself off, the angels would take charge and bear him up, saving his life and thus showing his value to God. Jesus again declined with a quotation, "You shall not test the lord your God."

The Cardinal Inquisitor continues on with his theme that again Jesus made a mistake, and that people need a demonstration of this sort in order to have faith, and that Man NEEDS a transcendent-to-human-being son of God. To be inspired primarily by the purpose and values of a humble, equal human is outside of the Cardinal's thinking range.

Temptation 3. The first two temptations were easy compared to the third. The first two were merely asking Jesus to do something unreasonable with only the retention of his life at stake. Who cares about the value of one's life to someone else or even the sustenance of one's life if there is no enhancement, no way to triumph over paucity or dearth of fulfillment? Lot's of people destroy their own lives voluntarily by suicide in such a situation.

"More precious than gold, more sought after than
love, more addictive than any drug: Power!"

The gloves were now off because the third temptation was about power, control and fulfillment of most all the natural and artificial needs and desires that humans have. More wealth, power, superiority, privilege, deference, romantic attention and sexual gratification than any man had ever possessed, all within reach. Satan "showed him all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them", and offered it all to him if he acknowledged that he, Satan, and his ways, could grant this fulfillment and ultimately enhance his life. Jesus again refused with a quotation.

The Cardinal again presses his theme by claiming it was a mistake to not take the power, and how, now, only the church is left as the alternative in taking the power so that it could numb the people's angst over the burden of free will and provide for their mundane spiritual security.

First temptation analyzed

We, of course, do not have to understand these tests or temptations in the same way that Dostoevsky portrays them. In the first, the simple logic would be that if God led you to the brink of dying, the burden should then be on Him–God–to do something to get you out of the predicament. If God could do this to you and not be ready to save you, what is the point of living and worshipping?

Second temptation analyzed

In the second is the seed of logic to discount the literal reality of this scenario ever having happened. If it is not legitimate for us to test God in arbitrary ways, it would not be legitimate for him, in the name of love, to test US in this way. Nobody in a relationship likes to be arbitrarily or purposely tested by the other. Jesus was tested often by the reality of the situation and the issues, not by God or a literal "Satan". Also, God made us, and he knows about us; we didn't make him, and DON'T know about him in the same way!

Third temptation analyzed

In the third testing scenario the simple logic, promulgated by the IF-I-SEEK-US package, is that the temporal, mundane and limited fulfillment available in this world–even IF you had it ALL–IS NOT ENOUGH, and it would NEVER ultimately satisfy. Given the opportunity in a reasonable way to really "have the all" that is spoken about so eloquently in the Gospel of Thomas, one would simply be foolish to opt for any mundane package in this world. A no-brainer if you actually understand and believe in the Kingship of the Heavens! Jesus was not available to sell out for mundane rewards, even IF they could have been delivered.

[*]  The title "Satan" is used in the earliest Gospel, Mark, and then changed to the "Devil" in the later ones. This is telling, in that the concepts of the two are NOT the same, and the development of the Devil motif was not done until later in Christian times, not until after the Gospel of Mark was composed.

Home   Site Sections   Article Map   Contact   Store   Contributions   Survey