Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

Intelligent, reasonable men of good will SHOULD be able to agree on things that matter.

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Article Synopses and other features

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Bible/Canon Issues
Christendom Analyzed

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon

Philosophy Material
Paradigm Material
Philosophical Issues
Psychological Issues
Religious Miscellaneous
Sociological Material
Theological Basics
Theological Issues
Theological Misc

Theological Skeptical

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material

Cosmology Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Chronology Revision
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Modern Mythology Material
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Symbol Development
Venus-Mars Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium

Miscellaneous Material
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Site Features Links
Spiritual Products online store

Godhood is achieved, not when you have absolute power,
not when you have absolute knowledge, but when you find
more pleasure and fulfillment in serving others than being
- Site Author

"The greatest achievements of the human mind are
generally received with distrust."
- Arthur Schopenhauer

Updated: 04/27/2020

The ancient humans on earth, who we sometimes incautiously revere, all believed that the planets of the pantheon were gods, especially the earlier sun Saturn, but also our sun of today. The sun is partially beneficent, giving off the light and energy that we absolutely need, and giving credit for that is a partial  form of sun worship. Ancient mythology and ancient sacred texts accept all that. Why do we not do so today?

"Is the sun benevolent? How does it inspire your daily life? Does it constantly rage? I don't know, and you don't know either, and it's not a thing we can risk lying about, because they [aliens] may very well know themselves. To them, a star is a living entity. It's a god, but more than our gods, because they can see a star and feel its heat and never doubt that it's always there." - G. Eklund and G. Benfor, "If the Stars are Gods," Universe 4 (N. Y., 1974), pp. 121-159, especially pp. 129-131

All of this raises the following questions:

  1. What are the intellectually responsible criteria for defining a God?
  2. Why should we care?
  3. Is there a God that exists whether we want one or not?
  4. Does the word “Creator” mean something different from the word “God?” If we do not define the concepts of Creator and God in an intellectually responsible way, why are these concepts relevant?
  5. What do we need a God for?
  6. What good does having a God do?
  7. What would or should a God worthy of the term offer to us?
  8. What would a specific person have to offer in order to be considered as God?
  9. How would a God be different from us?
  10. Would a God be transcendent or superior?
  11. Would a God be dangerous to be around?
  12. Would a God be an “ideal” person?  An ideal human? Ideal for whom?
  13. If you met God in human form in person, how would you know?  How could you tell? Would you just take his word for it?
  14. Would a God be perfect?  By whose or what standard or criteria?
  15. What would it take for you to really believe in God?
  16. If one's fundamental concepts of God are wrong, how could one ever get them right?
  17. From where did your concepts of God come? From religious upbringing and teaching?
  18. Can you ground your concepts in your own personal study, research, thinking and conviction?
  19. What should or should not a God do to change our concepts to be accurate?
  20. Who should answer these question except you?

It is very productive to occasionally re-ask the fundamental questions.

Some theological premises of this site are:

  • That we need a better, more meaningful definition of the term "God"
  • That the proper definition of "sin" is holding a wrong, destructive concept or understanding of "God", of his character, purpose, values and intentions
  • That Jesus came to resolve this most fundamental problem, once and for all, with a wonderful and adequate demonstration for the entire universe
  • Part of the premise is that Christendom has adopted a false and shallow definition of Sin, one based not on how Jesus defined and used the term, but one based on Old and New Testament Legalism.

Home   Site Sections   Article Map   Contact   Store   Contributions   Survey