Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

Intelligent, reasonable men of good will SHOULD be able to agree on things that matter.

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Reading Sequence, and Article Synopses

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Bible/Canon Issues
Christendom Analyzed

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon

Philosophy Material
Paradigm Material
Philosophical Issues
Psychological Issues
Sociological Material
Theological Basics
Theological Issues
Theological Misc

Theological Skeptical

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material

Cosmology Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Chronology Revision
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Modern Mythology Material
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Symbol Development
Venus-Mars Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium

Miscellaneous Material
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Spiritual Products online store



"The broad mass of a nation... will more easily fall
victim to a big lie than to a small one."
- Adolf Hitler

Common "Hidden" Theological Assumptions
Updated: 03/27/2020

So much of the time, when people start thinking, doing, or talking theology, they do not get in touch with their underlying or hidden assumptions.  They usually do not realize or acknowledge that they even have a slew of these basic assumptions, and therefore, cannot think and ask questions outside this box.  For instance, very rarely does a Protestant theologian acknowledge that the most fundamental assumption or cornerstone that his Christian theology is built upon is the idea that the Bible is the "Special Revelation" of God.

The entire tenor and thinking of Judeo-Christian theology is built upon upon this foundational assumption:

The nature of God assumed to be ineluctably transcendent and superior to being human, and God is therefore trapped in his ultimate superiority to the point of NEVER being able to have a peer relationship. Pull this one assumption down, and the whole edifice collapses like the proverbial house of cards..

The entire structure of Protestant theology also hinges upon the following three assumptions:

1) Disciples Understood: That enough of the disciples that followed J understood enough to get the truth of the big picture given by Yeshua, and that they let that educate and inspire their theology, their agenda, and their writings.

2) Disciples Recorded: That together they recorded enough actual information about Yeshua and his message for us to get the truth through their text. This is most obviously not true!

Regarding these two issues, one person wrote to me, saying:

"It is very evident that all current practitioners of "Christianity" in each of its various flavors misses the mark. Why? Because the "mark" is too difficult to understand? Because the mark is just too good to believe? Because mankind is just too far gone to make the grade? Because not enough "seed" fell on good ground?
    "As far as what the apostles understood or failed to understand we have very little information as only John left us any meaningful record. The 2 letters attributed to Peter say very little.  In my continued reading of the three synoptic Gospels there is one thing that keeps disturbing me. They all focus on recording the "super natural" events of Yeshua's ministry with the offhand comment that He went from village to village "teaching in their synagogues" and proclaiming the "Gospel of the Kingdom" yet almost NEVER record what He said in His teaching and preaching except for the one comment that men should repent of their sins.
    "For me the bottom line is whether or not there is enough pertinent information clearly expressed for people in this day to 'get it right'....
    "IF the apostles did indeed understand, it is clear that it didn't take root in the people who initially 'joined the way'"....

Since almost by definition, the problem is on OUR END, we must operate on the belief that there IS enough, and that our framing has been wrong, or our focus has been wrong, or some foundational assumption has been wrong. Or any and all of the above.

3) Committees directed by God: That the committees and processes that put together the New Testament canon were directed by God or that the results of these were CONTROLLED by God:

This means that the final output of their criteria, processes and conclusions were therefore infallible, at least on some meaningful level, and that the usual social influences and politics were counteracted or neutralized. Is this reasonable? When was the last time you sat on an infallible committee?

Some of the other formidable "hidden" assumptions that I would challenge are that:

The Originator is in personal control of the universe.

God is a fiat law giver and requires obedience to his law.

God cannot be understood because "his ways are past understanding".

The J-person has a dual nature, and only while on earth operated from the human side.

The Originator is non-sexual, and there will be no carnal sexual activity in heaven.

God is the designer/creator of the natural biological and botanical life forms pretty much as we see them, although this "natural realm" is "fallen" and degenerate.

For Protestants, the Bible is the "Word of God" and the J-person has put his stamp of approval on this foundational idea.

For Catholics, the J-person put his stamp of approval upon the understandings and dogmas promulgated by the disciples headed by Peter, and the Pope is the latest in a long line of God-appointed authorities when he is speaking ex cathedra.

Heaven is a place or the kingdom of the heavens is a material territory, the home of God over which He has operational control.

God can "see" into the future indefinitely, and knows all the possibilities of what will happen.

God has an agenda, phenomenological or chronological which must be worked out on earth, and of which he is in significant control; the ball is mostly in his court and only incidentally in ours.

“God the Father” is an individual.

God is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent.

God is waiting for us to surrender to his will and or his control.

That a "spirit" is a kind of incorporeal sentient being and not just an attitude and/or mentality.

That Old Testament “history” and/or most of its major aspects can be taken quite literally instead of allegorically.

With the exception of Judas, the disciples or apostles all understood the message or good news of the J-person, were sealed in the truth, and became legitimate "apostles" or spokesmen for God.

The J-person ordained the major rites, sacraments and ceremonies with which Christianity is so infused.

The "sacred" iconography, artwork and statuary in which Christianity revels is helpful to the establishment and support of faith.

Blithely assumes that when Yeshua says, "It is written" that he is always endorsing the concept or doctrine rather than just emphasizing a point or portraying how the religious leaders were violating their own scripture and standards.

Yeshua came in part to affirm the legitimacy of the Old Testament law and prophets.

Yeshua put some kind of stamp of approval upon the religion of Israel by choosing that nation for his apocalypse or unveiling of the true character of God.

There are MORE assumptions that could be listed, but enough is enough! I happen to think that every one of these assumptions above is wrong or misguided. This is one more reason to do a major reevaluation and rethink.

Home   Site Sections   Article Map   Contact   Store   Contributions   Survey