Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Reading Sequence, and Article Synopses

The Human Condition

Human Context
Human Consensus
Garden, Fall, Restore
Defending the Faith
Catastrophe Influence
Human Nature
Religious Diversity
Solutions to Disunity
Industrial Revolution
Humanity Questions
State of Philosophy
State of Academia
Fall of Man
The Third Story
Evil of Ordinary
Essence of Koran
A Look Ahead
Personal Accnt/Question

Site Section Links

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Christendom Analyzed
Christendom Challenged
Christendom Condemned
Bible/Canon Issues

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon

Philosophy Material
Paradigm Material
Philosophical Issues
Psychological Issues
Sociological Material
Theological Issues

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material
Cosmology Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Modern Mythology Material
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Venus-Mars Material
Symbol Development
1994 Velikovsky Symposium
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Chronology Revision

Miscellaneous Material
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Spiritual Products online store


“A great majority of the so-called educated people do not think logically and scientifically. Even the press, the classroom, the platform, and the pulpit in many instances do not give us objective and unbiased truths. To save man from the morass of propaganda, in my opinion, is one of the chief aims of education. Education must enable one to sift and weigh evidence, to discern the true from the false, the real from the unreal, and the facts from the fiction. The function of education, therefore, is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically.”  - Martin Luther King Jr., 1947

Education....has produced a vast population able to read but
unable to distinguish what is worth reading.
- George Trevelyan

The State of Western Academia

Don’t think that I have been a follower of Rush Limbaugh or that I have even listened to him except incidentally when he was being interviewed on another serious talk show program.

But he agrees with me on this issue without even having half of the rationale that I do. I quote:

“Western academia is broken."

If you’ve been following the planetary catastrophe/Electric Universe movement, then you probably agree that the American, and indeed the Western system of higher education has been broken for quite some time. Rogue feminist Camille Paglia has spoken at great length about the false and deceptive path that colleges have gone down since the 1960s. She explains that, breaking from the largely honest and truly rebellious spirit of freedom which won the day in the 60s, the movement more or less drugged itself out of existence. Her peers slowly ruined their minds by abusing LSD or other psychedelics, and all of the meaningful intellectuals washed out. This, she says, created the power vacuum that a kind of corporate class of academics needed to move in and take administrative positions in colleges.”

What Rush doesn’t get and few others do is that these institutions, EXCEPT for the more mundane technical, business, management, literary, clerical, etc., TRAINING, have been corrupted at a deeper level down to their ENTIRE soul, not just their politically correct soul. They have been taken over by people that have a strong bias for truth being transitory and relative. In their mind it’s all relative, and you can’t “live” well and sort it out very meaningfully. And what does it matter anyway?

One of the developments is an almost complete fragmentation of learning into discrete compartments that overlap only a little. There is no vision nor desire to produce men that can INTEGRATE things very much, especially into a big picture. Why would you TRY to do that? It is presumed that that is now not possible, and presumptuous to try.

Modern academia has not structured its education and curriculum around philosophy AS IT SHOULD, but rather has featured or focused on technical education and career preparation. Today, many feel that formal philosophy is arcane and unnecessary, and more than one leading influential figure like Stephen Hawking has denounced it as irrelevant, ostensibly because science is thought to be "real" and philosophy theoretical.

Thus they have all but abandoned real philosophy—sterling, humanity expanding principles of epistemology and metaphysics, and wisdom that one can be sure of—and relegated it to being a somewhat interesting but arcane realm of academic study, mostly a left-over from earlier, less advanced days.

They have also taken history, drained the drama and philosophical blood out of it, and made it into a mere uninspiring academic requirement of learning facts and information. If you don't understand the philosophy or mindset behind the social and political movements of the past, how can you ever learn lessons from history? I have to admit that when I was in my college years, I had no appreciation for nor interest in learning history. No one set the study of it in a context that stimulated my interest.

Astronomy, the queen of the sciences, is still largely associated with the universities and has significant influence on societal thinking, but it is a wasteland because it has gone almost completely into "scientific" mysticism. It has clung to the gravity-centric paradigm, and has rejected the Electric Universe paradigm. It is now mostly concerned with black holes, dark matter, and keeping itself funded. It has left the real world, so much so, that one wonders why they use telescopes anymore. Why don't astrophysicists emulate their great hero, Stephen Hawking, and just use their imagination supported by computers to model reality? Why don't they focus on developing more algorithms to generate the necessary information to fill in the gaps?

The theological seminaries teach various traditions and let the real understanding of ancient times and the ultimate issues lie fallow. They actually accept the pronouncements of "Science" and circumspectly keep their teaching within these limits.  They are concerned with "academic" accreditation, when the only real sign of a valid form of it is producing men that can think critically, make an impact, and bestir society into reform leading to greater nobility and unity.

Sir Fred Hoyle has commented that academics
generally will not read papers they disagree with.

People with real vision that even have the potential to actually see how bad it is in academe have been winnowed out in a dozen effective ways. There is not a chance that any reformer could get through the micro-pore filter in place today and make an impact! And, not a chance that any significant world changing truth could get through either. These institutions are imponderable bastions for all that matters to them—orthodoxy, status quo and stability—and yet they are aflame with fashionable, liberal social causes.

Spiritually and/or intellectually, academia has long since transferred its faith to the new religion of scientism. They stopped listening to sacred-text-authority-based theologians and transitioned over to the “revolutionaries” in science, Darwin, Einstein, Bohr, etc. They have overwhelmingly settled into a world view of gradualism, uniformitarianism, materialism, evolutionism, and scientifically acceptable mysticism where—for the non-religious—randomness and chance play a major role in how the universe unfolds. It should be noted that there is little if any meaningful difference between randomness and chance versus the purpose and control of a “Who-can-know-thy-ways" God. .

A university is a place where men of principle
outnumber men of honor
. - Ernest May

If they are not passionate scientism believers, these are the kinds of administrators and department heads that you can invite to an Electric Universe Conference, and they will come and listen for what all the fuss is about. But what they conclude is that it is just another take—just another possibility fostered by fervent enthusiasts—out there with a myriad of others; always with the possibility that one of these “fringe takes” that haven’t been fleshed out, verbalized well, or "accepted" may exceed the plethora of the ones that have already.

They don’t get too excited, one way or another about these kinds of things. EU theory? It’s possible and interesting. Saturnian Reconstruction? That’s hardly even remotely possible, and not worth talking about, taking seriously, or especially risking departmental cohesiveness nor academic political approval. Meanwhile, that’s just the Physics Department’s problem. Take any serious responsibility for fostering a relevant truth? You’ve got to be kidding! Why would you DO that?

What they DO take seriously is their careers and professional acceptability. They may mildly disapprove of the heavy influence of and emphasis on sports for their institution, but these are little more than bureaucrats or academic apparatchiks. They are politically astute and carry around an acceptable socio/political/religious posture. They may even have fashionably a minor cause that they espouse and foster to show they are not entirely uncaring. If something like the EU ever does tend to prevail, they can always say, “Oh yes, I looked into that 10 years ago and found it to be quite interesting, but didn’t have the time to really pursue it.”

And maybe I am mistaken in my perspective. Maybe it’s been like this much longer than I, Rush, and Camille realize!

See: Bullying Nagel

Home   Site Sections   Complete Article Map   Contact   Store   Contributions