Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

Intelligent, reasonable men of good will SHOULD be able to agree on things that matter.

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Reading Sequence, and Article Synopses

"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." – Dolores Ibarruri

The Special Challenge of Equality
Updated: 01/21/2020

I have asked everyone with whom I associate whether they would rather have inferiors, superiors, or equals as their friends. Invariably the latter is clearly preferred. Fellowship with human peers is the acme of social fulfillment. We can love our pets, love our servants or underlings, but our deepest, truest love can only be engendered by those that are equal.

The prevailing and most fundamental dogma of the world's major religions is that the Creator is inherently transcendent (read alien) and superior to us as humans. Challenge this and you will be considered a blasphemer, worthy of scorn and ridicule by those religious elements that are constrained by the civil state, while others not so restrained will consider it a duty as well as a privilege to serve "God" by killing you. The concept of equality with the Creator gets their attention big time, and with animosity.

Nevertheless, any Creator worthy of the term "God" must not be alien to us in terms of purpose and values. Given this premise, it is only reasonable that the creator created other beings for his fellowship and not for some other less than noble purpose such as servitude, slavery, military duty, obedience minions, or even something more nefarious. Yet, "theology" in general is schizophrenic: on the one hand striving to understand God and urging others to do so, and on the other, generally positing that such an endeavor cannot succeed.

I am afraid of getting older … I am afraid of getting married.
Spare me from cooking three meals a day–spare me from the
relentless cage of routine and rote. I want to be free…. I want,
I want to think, to be omniscient…. I think I would like to call
myself ‘The girl who wanted to be God.'
- Sylvia Plath

The challenge for the Creator, of course, was to create equals or peers. Equality obviously cannot be created in a being or injected by another being. As soon as you can do this–create or inject equality–you are inherently superior and any true equality evaporates. Equality can be extended to another being, but it must be chosen by them to be other than a farce or facade. When obvious differences exist, equality only comes when the other, created with the potential to be equal, CHOOSES to accept that equality when it is extended.

I have asked many red-blooded men what they would create if they were all alone in the universe and if they had godlike creative power. The almost consistent answer was, "A woman." The one exception was blurted out by a man with a playful grin, "Trouble."  Unfortunately, I knew what he meant! But what kind of woman? The next question, after the list of fantasy specifications was elicited, is the aim of this exercise.

So, imagine you have created this perfect dream of a female creature there looking at you with interest. You have given her every desirable, enticing female physical feature and trait with those being flawless. You have endowed her with eyes to get lost in, hair with an intoxicating aroma, a mellifluous voice, pearlescent skin, graceful movement, enchanting curves and more moving parts than a Swiss watch. You have programmed her with intelligence, language, and all the responses you desire, even all the knowledge that you have.  Yet is this anything more than  a humanoid? Is this really a woman? No. Can you really be in love with such a thing, no matter how complex and attractive? No. What is missing? Volition, desire, self-esteem, and the other dimensions that make us human, of course, and not just volition but volition enabled to be used to choose equality. Any aspect of a fulfilling relationship is ignoble if she isn't considered to be an equal, and can't maintain her own free will, and isn't free to say yes OR no.

Given the above impossibility to inject equality, and the challenge to engender it, the potential is there for a new being or new family in the universe to NOT choose equality. Yet, it is really not in our makeup to be underlings, and we cannot help but chafe in such a predicament of feeling inferior. If a human being cannot be equal, he will in some way try to be superior. Don't we all know that a superiority complex comes from insecurity related to feeling inferior? Are we not made to be equal in value, rights, and privileges yet with a variety of differences?

You are free to do what you want, but you are
not free to want what you want.
- Schopenhauer

Every human being has a natural, intrinsic and legitimate desire for equality.

Home   Site Sections   Article Map   Contact   Store   Contributions   Survey