Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

Intelligent, reasonable men of good will SHOULD be able to agree on things that matter.

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Article Synopses and other features

Paradigm Aspect Links

Arp & Galileo
Bicameral Mind Paradigm
Catastrophe Paradigm
Catastrophe Paradigm Lockout
Creator Paradigm
Electric Universe Theory
Gospel Paradigm
Holographic Universe
Holographic World
Human Destiny
Jesus as Paradigm
Love Paradigm
Many Worlds Paradigm
New Paradigm
Paradigm List
Paradigm Lockout
Paradigm of Evil
Paradigm Shift
Paradigm of Solipsism
Paradigm Speculation
Philosophy Paradigm
Reincarnation Paradigm
Sin Paradigm
The Paradigm Conspiracy
The Third Story
The Universe as Organism
Turkey-Day Paradigm
What-If Paradigm

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Bible/Canon Issues
Christendom Analyzed

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon

Philosophy Material
Paradigm Material
Philosophical Issues
Psychological Issues
Religious Miscellaneous
Sociological Material
Theological Basics
Theological Issues
Theological Misc

Theological Skeptical

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material

Cosmology Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Chronology Revision
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Modern Mythology Material
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Symbol Development
Venus-Mars Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium

Miscellaneous Material
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Site Features Links
Spiritual Products online store

"Where love rules there is no will to power, and where power predominates,
 love is lacking. The one is the shadow of the other."
- Carl Jung

Updated: 06/29/2020

LOVE: See Love under Definitions.

LOVE versus INDIFFERENCE: The opposite of love is not hate, but indifference. When we hate somebody, we are at least acknowledging that they matter and they are somebody of note in that they can have an impact on our lives. We are at least showing them some respect in that they can have an affect, and we are paying them some attention which everyone needs in order to live. When we are indifferent to someone we are making a statement that they don't matter, that they can have no impact on our lives, one way or another, whatsoever; they are totally insignificant, worthless, minuscule.

LOVE versus SACRIFICE: Loving someone means that you are highly motivated to sustain and enhance that person's life WITHOUT sacrificing aspects of your own life. Making a tradeoff is NOT sacrifice but is merely the best decision for yourself. It is possible to love someone so much and to entwine lives to the degree that you don't want to continue living without, or to risk or willingly lose your life in order to save the other's life. Again, this is NOT sacrifice but the best personal decision.

LOVING JESUS: Jesus has told us what he wants or how we can love him. There are only two ways, one direct and one indirect, and they both involve loving ourselves simultaneously while loving him. Primarily and directly we can love him by focusing on his message, paying attention to what he said and did, and choosing to believe what he said. John 14:23 "If any man loves me, he will cherish my word." Secondarily or indirectly we can love him by supporting and cherishing his true spiritual brothers. Mt 25:40 " As you have done it unto one of the least of these my brothers, you have done it unto me." John 13:35 " By this will all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." John 15:17 "This I instruct you, that you love one another."

"Love never dies a natural death. It dies because we don't know how to replenish its source. It dies of blindness and errors and betrayals. It dies of illness and wounds; it dies of weariness, of witherings, of tarnishings." - Anais Nin

What is being said above is that love is like a living plant in ourselves and the other person. It needs to be tended, watered, nourished and protected. It is NOT indestructible, and the other person has the moral and ethical freedom to let it die if it is not nurtured.

INVOLVEMENT versus RELATIONSHIP: There are three types of human involvement or social transaction–taking, giving and trading, and one type of morale building human relationship, sharing. People can be generally categorized into four types based on their primary way of interacting with others–takers, givers, traders, and sharers.


Most of us fairly easily come to understand that taking is wrong, and nobody likes an inveterate taker. In the material realm of this world these are called conmen or thieves and eventually wind up incarcerated or ostracized. Taking in a transaction means the taker "wins" and someone else loses.


We have been taught and conditioned by Christianity to think of giving as being right, proper and virtuous. However, when taken to its logical conclusion, givers go broke–there are too many takers. Giving, called charity, is many times ultimately demeaning and counter-productive to those receiving. Giving encourages and produces takers and taking. Giving in a transaction means the giver loses and someone else wins.


Trading is the prevailing order of the day in our competitive world. Caveat Emptor–let the buyer beware! May the best trader win! Even in a fair trade where both parties improve their position, both parties sustain loss, they both have to give something up so that they can get what they want or need. The trading mentality permeates our entire society and world. In the erotic realm, trading is called prostitution; however, the coin of the realm is not always currency. This "coin" can be status, security, respectability, or other political or social advantages, it can even be having children.


The fourth possibility concerns relationship and is called sharing. Sharing is a win/win situation, everybody wins, nobody loses. Sharing takes place without loss of freedom.
    When Jesus asked the rich young ruler to sell his possessions and give to the poor, his primary concern was not for the poor but for the rich young ruler who was going to lose nothing but obstacles to following Jesus and entering the real Kingship of the heavens or realm of goodness.

MARRIAGE versus COMMITMENT: True marriage is only sanctified or validated by romantic love and naturally committed love, not by any formal rite, ceremony or vows with priestly blessing. Marriage as a legal contract is strictly a human institution and was never ordained, instituted, or authorized by the creator. Marriage is seen as "making a commitment", but love doesn't demand commitment and loss of freedom, love CREATES commitment. Much of the time, the whole mentality of marriage as it has evolved in the world is one of ownership and obligation, completely opposite to the ideal way to live.
     Thus the only possible legitimacy or efficacy of a legal marriage contract between two people who are romantically involved is strictly the benefit of having a written legal contract as a form of an agreement between people in this world when there is a dispute. This means that the legal marriage contract as constituted in the general society of the United States is the worst possible kind of contract in that it is vague, nebulous or silent as to specifics and terms of abrogation, and is subject to a different interpretation in every state, county and courtroom in the country. Many people design and sign pre-nuptial agreements or other contracts.

DIVORCE: In a spiritually legitimate relationship, divorce only happens when one party FAILS to keep the love of the other person alive. When EITHER party desires to end the relationship its legitimacy is over. Any divorce that takes place happens spiritually before it happens legally. No self respecting person would even want to be in a relationship with someone that did not reciprocate the desire, nor would they want the other person to sacrifice for them.

Let's remember that Jesus had nothing good or encouraging to say about marriage as it was so constituted or understood. The idea, that some formal religion appointed "representative" of God can sanctify marriage in some formal ceremony whereby anything else is "immoral", is nothing short of pretentious and absurd. No wonder it is increasingly fashionable to delay or skip marriage altogether.

Home   Site Sections   Article Map   Contact   Store   Contributions   Survey