Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

Should not intelligent, reasonable men of good will be able to agree on all things that matter?

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Article Synopses and other features

Philosophical Issues

   Building Belief
Building Belief System
Path to the Truth
The Sound Foundation
   Philosophy Aspects
Axiomatic Philosophical Principles
Meaningful Epistemology
Modern Philosophy
Nature of the Spiritual Realm
Philosophical Methods
The Philosophical Branches
   Important Issues
Closing of Scientific Mind
Evil Just Illusion Issue
Fear and its Nature
Freedom versus Liberty
Fundamental Issues
Life and Ethics
Life Comes from Life
Philosophy of Power
Philosophy of Religion
Physical vs Spiritual Reality
Self Interest
Sexual Intimacy
The Ground of Creativity
The Issue of Certainty
Volition Issues
Religious Freedom
Structuralism Rebuttal
Transformational Training
Value of Consistency
What is Love?
Will versus Intellect
Ethics versus Morality
Fundamental Hypocrisy
Definition of Reductionism
Definition of Time
Knowledge Categories
Philosophies and Terms
Superstition & Myth
Meaning and Existentialism
Something Meaningful
China & Imago Viva Dei
Collingwood on Abstraction
Collingwood on Metaphysics
Collingwood on Philosophy
Critical Thinking
Games People Play
Interdisciplinary Study
Science and Religion
Scientific Method
Smug versus Straw Man
Thought Laws

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Bible/Canon Issues
Christendom Analyzed

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon

Philosophy Material
Academic Education
Paradigm Material
Philosophers of Note
Philosophical Issues
Philosophy Metaphysics
Psychological Issues
Religious Miscellaneous
Sociological Material
Theological Basics
Theological Issues
Theological Misc

Theological Skeptical

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material

Cosmology Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Chronology Revision
Golden Age Themes
History Revision
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Modern Mythology Material
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Symbol Development
Venus-Mars Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium

Miscellaneous Material
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Site Features Links
Spiritual Products online store

"To know or not to know? That is the question."

The possession of knowledge does not kill the sense of
wonder and mystery. There is always more mystery.
- Anais Nin

Updated: 01/07/2021

There are five basic categories of knowledge, two of fundamental reliability, two of less reliability, and one of more tenuous reliability.

1) Intrinsic Intrinsic knowledge is a kind of "hard wired" or intuitive knowledge that can still be further developed as time goes on.  Intrinsic knowledge shows up in rationality and the application of logic, allows us to know how to learn.  Intrinsic knowledge is internal, and is the most reliable or trustworthy knowledge that we have.

2) Sensory  Sensory knowledge is simple perception which comes directly from the five senses that we don't normally question.  Sensory knowledge is personal, dependent upon intrinsic knowledge, and usually takes a minimum of interpretation.

3) Evidential Evidential knowledge is composed of personally experienced evidence which implies either tentative conclusions or those reached beyond a reasonable doubt.  With this type of knowledge we sense or address the evidence directly but not the thing itself, and this knowledge is less reliable than that based on experience because it overwhelmingly relies upon interpretation. Evidential knowledge has an external source, and is significantly less reliable than intrinsic or sensory knowledge.

4) Experiential Experiential knowledge is composed of perhaps prolonged personal life experiences that have come in a series of learning situations.  It is always a personal mix of beliefs and other knowledge that takes a maximum of interpretation, yet it can be at times a most meaningful knowledge.  The validity of this knowledge is conditional on the validity of the personal interpretation.

5) Consentual Consentual knowledge is composed of knowledge that others have shared that we consent to hold because we trust (rightly or wrongly) in the person or source passing on this externally derived knowledge.  Often the consent is given based purely on the lack of any reason not to trust and should always be held with skepticism.  Consentual knowledge can be broken down further into three meaningful categories:

a.  That based on other's intrinsic, sensual, evidential, and experiential knowledge and interpretation.

b.  That based on other's consentual knowledge.

c.   That based on other's beliefs, opinions, estimations, imaginations, misinterpretations, fantasies, falsities, misunderstandings, neuroses, and psychoses.

Consentual knowledge is the most prevalent and voluminous knowledge that we have, but is obviously the least reliable.


There are five basic categories of proposed positions, again presented in descending reliability.

1)  Proven:  Conceptual constructs of realities that have adequate supporting facts and foundation, have not been falsified or disconfirmed, and have also been supported by all relevant observations or demonstrations so that it is more reasonable to accept the proposition than to not accept it.

2)  Probable:  Conceptual constructs of realities that have substantial supporting facts and foundation, have not been falsified or disconfirmed, and have also been supported by enough observations or demonstrations where it is reasonable to accept the proposition tentatively or as probable.

3)  Potential:  Conceptual constructs of realities that have less than substantial supporting facts and foundation, have not been falsified or disconfirmed, and have been supported by some observations or demonstrations where it is reasonable to entertain the proposition as potentially true but not to accept it or rely upon it.

4)  Pretentious:  Rather arbitrary conceptual constructs of realities that assume facts and foundation not in evidence and have neither been confirmed nor have been supported by enough observations or demonstrations to where it is neither seemingly productive nor reasonable to accept or entertain the proposition.

5)  Preposterous:  Conceptual constructs that violate other better supported concepts, that have flimsy or little to no foundation in facts and evidence, have not been supported with observations or demonstrations, or violate sound epistemological and/or metaphysical principles.

Note: Many scientific "theories" actually fall into this latter category, and this is an unfortunate travesty caused by the race-wide psychological trauma and the human condition.

Home   Site Sections   Article Map   Contact   Store   Contributions   Survey