Imminent FulfillmentImmortality,  Safety, Empowerment, Equality, KnowledgeUnity, Society

Intelligent, reasonable men of good will SHOULD be able to agree on things that matter.

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to
  one who is striking at the root."
- Henry David Thoreau
Site Sections, Subject List, Reading Sequence, and Article Synopses

Psychological Issues

Truth Barriers
The Ego Problem
The Agenda Dichotomy
Levels of Volition
Human Volition
Free Will Article
A Call to Consciousness
Integrity versus Authority
Hypocrisy Analysis
Hedonism vs Fulfillment
Belief Arrogance
Self Deception
   Catastrophe Effect
Cosmology & Psychology
Good/Evil Trivialization
Loss & Recovery of Self
Mindset: Ancient vs Modern
Sacrifice and Amnesia
The Terror of Death
   Bicameral Paradigm
Jaynes-Bicameral Mind
The Empty Mirror
Paranormal Experience
Flying in Formation
The Tyranny of Time
God Talking Arguments
Velikovsky's Introgenesis
Issue of Style
Examples of Cults

Introduction Material
Introduction Articles
Word Definitions
Human Condition

Christianity Material
Bible/Canon Issues
Christendom Analyzed

Jesus Material
Jesus' Teachings
Aspects of Jesus
5 Gospels Canon

Philosophy Material
Paradigm Material
Philosophical Issues
Psychological Issues
Sociological Material
Theological Issues

Cosmology, Creation,
Geophysical Material

Cosmology Material
Creation Issues
Geophysical Material

Reconstruction &
Mythology Material
Chronology Revision
Misc Ancient Myth Material
Modern Mythology Material
Psycho-Catastrophe Articles
Saturn-Jupiter Material
Symbol Development
Venus-Mars Material
1994 Velikovsky Symposium

Miscellaneous Material
Book Critiques Links
Misc Biology Links
Misc Issues/Conclusions
Poetry & Fun Material
PDF Download Files
Lecture & Video Links
Spiritual Products online store

The Nietschean solution was, in effect, to start again now that the values and mythologies of the past had been so thoroughly discredited...His role was simply to see the problem with such tortured clarity that it could never again be ignored.  In his final years he descended into insanity.
     But, for most thinkers, starting again represented a kind of defeat.  It meant throwing away the whole history of religious insight and truth.  Perhaps the more sober, saner response was to find new ways of defending the ancient faith. 
Bryan Appleyard, Understanding The Present, Anchor Books, 1540 Broadway, New York, NY. 10036, 1992, p. 79.

Barriers to Truth
Updated: 01/24/2020

MIRE - 4 Major yet erroneous ideas that are Barriers to Truth 

Mysticism – God is the source of the mystical experience.
Inevitability – Physical degeneration, aging and death are inevitable.
Revelation – A lineage of designated authority or scripture is the Word of God.
Equality – The transcendence of the Creator precludes our being equal with that person.

First some thoughts about criteria.

How do we determine the truth of an idea, concept, proposal, postulation or theory?  Do we not always use criteria?  If we don’t use criteria, isn’t any postulation as true as the next one? The whole discipline of science is designed to separate out what is true and valid from superstition or falsity by using sound criteria. The fundamental criterion for the discipline of science is coherence with the facts and logic, which involves previous knowledge, experience and mathematical constraints. Truth never asks to violate our rationality, logic and reason; truth never asks us to be intellectually irresponsible.

One quite important criterion is the one involved with predictability. Does the postulate suggest, point to, and/or predict what its application produces?  If it does, this is taken to be the strongest evidence for its validity, especially if the predicted result is unusual. In relation to this in the realm of spiritual experience and growth some words of wisdom are, “By their fruits shall you know them.”

1.  Mystical or Supernatural Experience

In certain circles in Christendom 20-30 years ago, the mystical experience was equated with demon possession or demonology. Today, in many of those same circles, it’s the fashionable new frontier and considered to be the experiential validation of the Christian Experience or having the "Holy Spirit".

What do we mean by the mystical experience? The mystical experience ranges from feeling the presence of God, to hearing voices, to dreams and visions, to channeling, to feelings of ecstasy, to swooning, and to speaking in tongues, to heavenly visitations, to altered states of consciousness, and so on.  In Christendom this means the Holy Spirit is conceived in any other way except an indomitable attitude, and one of loving the truth.

What are the reasons to question God being involved with the mystical experience?  Let us count the ways:

  1. There is a sensible and plausible alternate explanation for each one of these phenomena.
  2. Nowhere in the Gospels does Jesus encourage us to have a close personal relationship with God; rather he encouraged us to seek the truth and to have close, loving relationships with our human brothers and sisters.
  3. There is no unifying theme applicable to people claiming to have the God Experience, no significant unity, and they are all over the map in what they believe.
  4. Those that have these experiences inevitably see themselves as favored by God and thereby special, and tend to use their "God Experience" as grounds for relating to people from a position of imagined superiority and enlightenment. They also assume this to be a divine endorsement of their set of beliefs.
  5. Nowhere in his message does Jesus suggest that God will talk to us short of being in the Kingship of the Heavens.
  6. It places God in the position of cruelly and capriciously playing favorites, for instance, answering the prayers of one woman who needed help finding the baking powder to finish baking her husband a cake (which would help contribute to his having a heart attack). She felt she needed to finish before the sun went down for the legalistic Sabbath observance. On the other hand we have God failing to answer the prayers of another young woman who had been kidnapped by a psychotic couple who kept her head clamped in a head-box that nearly suffocated her, and they subjected her to depraved sexual abuse and many other manners of horrific treatment for years. Indefensible and incomprehensible!
  7. The mystical experience is generally used to override or trump logic and reason.
  8. The derived instructions, sentiments and/or concepts are mutually exclusive and often outrageous and ridiculous, even criminal, savage and/or dangerous.
  9. The strongest reason to disassociate the mystical experience from God is that it is a pitifully inadequate endowment in the context of our plight. We desire and need ever so much more than the occasional dream, vision or voice in our head or a fleeting exotic feeling. As we struggle, suffer, age, and die in this environment, this is the best that God can do for us? And what do these occasional experiences have to do with anything that Jesus said? Where does he tell us to be satisfied with this level of coping?

The derived contributions to human understanding and improvements in the human condition and in human relationships from these experiences are singularly unimpressive.

Inevitability – Physical degeneration and aging, culminating in death are inevitable.

Our experience is totally consistent in this regard: We accept that we are born under a sentence of degeneration and death; all men must decay with age and die. Death and taxes are certain.  This is part of the greater message of relentless indifference from the physical universe and our experience in which we are constantly and consistently immersed.  The great psycho-analytical philosophers understood that this alone is enough to keep us in a state of psychological angst and unsoundness, a state of denial and suppressed insecurity.  What else can we then do but cope, devising schemes of belief that somehow make this human condition more acceptable?

Is there any significant, credible message or demonstration that gives us grounds to challenge the grim reaper? Well, YES! That is the emphatic message of the J-person reiterated and emphasized by this site in its focus and material.

Revelation – Revealed truth through scripture or appointed earthly authority is the Word of God.

From a critical thinking perspective the Old Testament has no element to recommend it to be considered as the word of God except tradition.  It reports fantastic things that violate sound science and  are outside of our experience, it paints a schizophrenic picture of God. and careful scholarship has shown that it has been extensively edited and redacted.  All ancient people worshipped the planet Saturn–generally as the chief God–and every term for God in the Old Testament (including Yahweh, El Shaddai, El Adonai, El and the plural Elohim) was a name or title for that ancient Sun-God, as were the terms and names of Saturn given by the gentiles, such as Moloch, Chemosh, Dagon, etc.  It is replete with impossible, nonsensical or atrocious activity, and can legitimately considered to be the mythology of the Hebrew people right alongside the other cultural mythologies.  Indeed a careful study of comparative mythology shows the tremendous overlap with the common themes of all other ancient mythology.

The word "canon" means measurer or ruler.  Both the Old Testament canon and the New Testament canon came to be regarded as special through a historical process, involving only the collective wisdom of the Hebrews over some 1200 years for the Old Testament, and involving only the collective "wisdom" of the errant Christian community over some 335 years for the New Testament.  Evidently, since Jesus disagreed with part of the Old Testament scriptures and quoted authoritatively from literature outside the canon, the process to canon was an earthly one only approximate in validity at best, and apparently God was minimally or not directly involved at all.

Much has been written about how the Tanakh (Old Testament) is divided up into the Torah, Nevi’im and Kethuvim, (Law, Prophets and Writings).  The Old Testament canon or Tanakh was apparently solidified by approx. 400 BC and consisted of these three categories of books.  Only the Pentateuch or Torah, represented by Moses on the mount of transfiguration, was considered to be authoritative and infallible.  The Prophets or Nevi’im, represented by Elijah on the mount, were considered to be "inspirational" but not infallible. The Writings or Kethuvim were significant romantic and cultural literature, which included hymns of praise, other songs, war chants, poetry, and adages. The Song of Solomon, included in the Old Testament canon is even considered to be pornographic by some Jewish believers.  Strangely enough, Jesus may have fulfilled more carefully and specifically some "prophetic" sections (note Psalm 22) of the Writings than of the other two categories.

The New Testament canon was solidified by 370 CE primarily by Roman "Christians" who were firmly entrenched in some of the major concepts of Judaism borrowed from Zoroastrianism, and who were allied with the civil, political and military authorities.  The New Testament writers are NOT presenting the same message as Jesus did and we should have no concern for the New Testament canon because Jesus presents himself as the VOICE OF REASON and LAST REVELATION, and HE told and showed us everything we need to know, in the context of claiming to fully represent and reveal God's purpose, plan, values and character. The life and message of the J person can stand on its own, and does NOT need validation from the "prophecies".

Notwithstanding its value as a source of historical information about the early believers and their experience, and its value to attest to the factual reality of Jesus, his experience, and his follower's response to that reality, the non-Gospel balance of the New Testament is no basis for building our understanding of God, our theology.  That objective basis must ALWAYS AND ONLY be the words, message and actions of Jesus.

Modern English Bibles and translations have evolved from a bad scholarship start with the King James, in the context of erroneous traditional concepts of Christianity. Out of reaction to the religious authority of Rome and its commensurate political influence and meddling, King James I of England in 1604 commissioned 54 men to produce the Authorized King James Version of the Bible.  This version was not really intended to be a valid translation but was purposely designed to pander to the Church of England and to especially not offend prevailing medieval religious sentiments.  Indeed the commission reported that,

"Neither did wee thinke much to consult the translators or Commentators, Chaldee, Hebrew, Syrian, Greeks, or Latine, nor no the Spanish, French, Italian, or Dutch." This statement doesn't mean that it didn't come to their minds, but rather that they deliberately decided not to do so.

Outside of its highly touted literary quality the most important thing for the people of that time was that it was AUTHORIZED BY THE KING, but its extremely poor quality of translation, egregious errors, and outdated wordage make it a document that effectively obscures much of the meaning intended by the original authors of the various books included in this particular canon.

The other source considered by some as revelation is paranormal experiences such as visions, dreams, automatic writing, and audible messages (The voice of God).  Clearly these can be generated internally between the left and right brains, especially under stress, and therefore are NOT reliable as revelations or foundations for conclusions about truth as an external source or revelation.

Equality – Transcendence of God precludes equality with him

The idea that God is transcendent, other than human, is the cornerstone of essentially all formal religions. It is also the cornerstone of evil, the original lie, the proton pseudos (first lie or fundamental mistake). This is the source of more theological craziness than any other idea in that it forces us to look to mysterious, non-understandable aspects of God in order to explain him and his workings. Not only does it make God into some kind of enigmatic megalomaniacal alien, but, when we say “thy ways are past understanding”, it leaves us without a basis to apply good logic and reason. This in turn concedes the field of influence to those with the most charismatic, tricky, political, enthusiastic, emotional, or aggressive style.

All in all, not so good, is it?

Home   Site Sections   Article Map   Contact   Store   Contributions   Survey